Illustrative Example
This story is based on typical security deposit disputes in Aurora. It illustrates common scenarios and outcomes under CRS §38-12-103. It is not a real client case.
Modeled Outcome
The recovery shown here is an illustrative modeled scenario. In Colorado, the actual remedy can depend on facts like notice, intent, coverage rules, or local law.
The Situation
This is an illustrative example based on typical security deposit disputes in Aurora. A renter lived in an Aurora apartment for four years and moved out. The landlord charged $900 for full carpet replacement citing worn carpet. Colorado's CRS §38-12-103 prohibits normal wear and tear deductions. After four years of occupancy, carpet depreciation calculations limited the legitimate charge to approximately $270.
What Happened
Photograph carpet in all rooms
The tenant photographed all carpeted areas on move-out day. The carpet showed matting in high-traffic areas and minor fading - consistent with four years of normal occupancy. No stains, no burns, no pet damage. The photos documented ordinary end-of-useful-life wear.
Receive $900 full carpet replacement charge
The landlord charged $900 for 'carpet replacement - worn throughout.' Colorado CRS §38-12-103 prohibits deductions for normal wear and tear, and four years of normal use on carpet with a 7-10 year lifespan is precisely what the statute protects.
Calculate depreciation to find legitimate maximum
The tenant calculated carpet depreciation: carpet installed at start of tenancy, $900 replacement cost, 10-year assumed lifespan, 4 years consumed. Remaining useful life: 6 years of 10 = 60%. Maximum legitimate charge: $900 x 40% (tenant's portion) = $360 for a full replacement scenario; with four years of normal wear, a reasonable maximum was approximately $270 accounting for pro-rated replacement.
Demand letter with depreciation analysis
The tenant sent a certified demand letter citing CRS §38-12-103, attaching the depreciation worksheet and move-out photos showing normal wear. The letter demanded return of the full $1,100 (accepting zero deduction given the full-depreciation argument) or a maximum $270 if the landlord could document actual new carpet installation cost.
Full deposit returned
The landlord returned the full $1,100 rather than litigate depreciation math in Colorado county court, where tenants with documented normal wear conditions routinely prevail on carpet disputes.
The Outcome
Four years of normal carpet use after move-in, with a documented clean move-out condition, eliminated the $900 carpet charge entirely. Colorado's wear-and-tear statute and depreciation principles combined to make the charge indefensible. The full $1,100 was returned in seven weeks.
Key Lesson
For long tenancies, calculate carpet depreciation before you move out - knowing the mathematical maximum legitimate charge gives you a clear negotiating position and shows the landlord you know exactly what you can and cannot be charged for.
Apply This to Your Situation
If you are dealing with a similar situation in Aurora, find out what your landlord may owe you. Free analysis, 2 minutes.
Check My Colorado Deposit