Illustrative Example
This story is based on typical security deposit disputes in Kansas City. It illustrates common scenarios and outcomes under RSMo §535.300. It is not a real client case.
The Situation
This is an illustrative example based on typical security deposit disputes in Kansas City. A renter moved out after their building was sold to a new owner. The new owner claimed the previous landlord never transferred the deposit, and the previous landlord claimed the new owner was responsible. Missouri Revised Statutes §535.300 governs deposit transfers during property sales. The tenant named both parties in small claims.
What Happened
Note deposit transfer obligation under Missouri law
When the tenant learned the building was sold, they sent a letter to both the old and new owner documenting their $1,400 deposit, citing RSMo §535.300, which requires the selling landlord to either transfer the deposit to the new owner or return it directly to the tenant. Missouri law is clear that the tenant's funds cannot be lost in a sale.
Both owners disclaim responsibility
Upon moving out, the tenant requested deposit return from the new owner. The new owner said 'the old owner kept the deposit.' The old owner said 'we transferred everything - the new owner has it.' The tenant documented both communications in writing.
Send demand letters to both owners
The tenant sent certified demand letters to both the old owner and the new owner citing RSMo §535.300 and Missouri's 30-day return deadline. The letters demanded the $1,400 from whichever party held the funds, or alternatively from both jointly, within 14 days.
File small claims naming both defendants
With neither owner responding substantively, the tenant filed in Jackson County Small Claims Court naming both the old and new owner as co-defendants. Naming both eliminates the 'they have it' defense and forces the court to determine who is responsible.
Court hearing - judge orders original landlord to pay
At the hearing, the original landlord could not produce documentation of the deposit transfer. Under RSMo §535.300, the selling landlord has the affirmative duty to either transfer the deposit or return it to the tenant - failure to prove transfer means liability rests with the seller.
Original landlord pays $1,400
The original landlord paid the $1,400 judgment within the required period. The dispute between the two owners about internal settlement was their problem to resolve separately.
The Outcome
Missouri's deposit transfer statute under RSMo §535.300 places the affirmative duty on the selling landlord to document the transfer. By naming both parties in small claims, the tenant eliminated the 'blame game' and let the court determine liability. The $1,400 was fully recovered.
Key Lesson
When your building sells, immediately send a written deposit notice to both owners citing your state's transfer statute - and if the deposit disappears, name both parties in small claims to eliminate the blame-shifting defense.
Apply This to Your Situation
If you are dealing with a similar situation in Kansas City, find out what your landlord may owe you. Free analysis, 2 minutes.
Check My Missouri Deposit